header-logo header-logo

15 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Magistrates request more creative options for sentencing

Magistrates have asked for more flexibility and creativity when sentencing convicted criminals, and urged the government not to abolish custodial terms of less than six months.

They also asked the government to recruit more probation officers, in their response last week to the government’s sentencing review, chaired by former Lord Chancellor David Gauke.

Mark Beattie, chair of the Magistrates’ Association (MA), said: ‘At the moment, within the existing sentencing framework, magistrates' options are limited to fines (which can be evaded) or custody when community options aren’t available or aren’t viable.

‘Magistrates should be able to apply other, practical alternatives to fines or custody, that would still be a deterrent to offenders while maintaining public confidence. For example, more use could be made of orders like driving disqualifications, travel restrictions, sexual harm prevention orders and football banning orders.

‘Reducing the current three-year minimum term for some of these orders could increase their applicability in these cases.’

Beattie warned the probation service is ‘under-staffed, resulting in significant delays to starting curfews, unpaid work orders and mental health treatment requirements (MHTR)’ while ‘weekend unpaid work placements—which are vital for those in full-time employment—are almost non-existent in many parts of the country’.

The MA response reports a case where an offender was given an MHTR as part of a suspended sentence but had to wait nearly six months for their first appointment, ‘was not able to access treatment in time and subsequently reoffended’. Other options ‘are so rigid that they are unworkable in the individual case’—for example, some programmes, such as ‘Building better relationships’, have waiting lists of more than 12 months.

More probation officers are therefore needed if more community sentencing is to be delivered.

The magistrates agreed short prison sentences are often counter-productive for many offenders and therefore should be treated as a last resort. However, they argued they are a useful deterrent for prolific shoplifters and offenders who refuse community options and should be retained.

Shabana Mahmood KC, the Lord Chancellor, was forced to release 1,100 prisoners early to ease overcrowding in October 2024, on the day she launched the Gauke review.

Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll