header-logo header-logo

Magistrates request more creative options for sentencing

15 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Magistrates have asked for more flexibility and creativity when sentencing convicted criminals, and urged the government not to abolish custodial terms of less than six months.

They also asked the government to recruit more probation officers, in their response last week to the government’s sentencing review, chaired by former Lord Chancellor David Gauke.

Mark Beattie, chair of the Magistrates’ Association (MA), said: ‘At the moment, within the existing sentencing framework, magistrates' options are limited to fines (which can be evaded) or custody when community options aren’t available or aren’t viable.

‘Magistrates should be able to apply other, practical alternatives to fines or custody, that would still be a deterrent to offenders while maintaining public confidence. For example, more use could be made of orders like driving disqualifications, travel restrictions, sexual harm prevention orders and football banning orders.

‘Reducing the current three-year minimum term for some of these orders could increase their applicability in these cases.’

Beattie warned the probation service is ‘under-staffed, resulting in significant delays to starting curfews, unpaid work orders and mental health treatment requirements (MHTR)’ while ‘weekend unpaid work placements—which are vital for those in full-time employment—are almost non-existent in many parts of the country’.

The MA response reports a case where an offender was given an MHTR as part of a suspended sentence but had to wait nearly six months for their first appointment, ‘was not able to access treatment in time and subsequently reoffended’. Other options ‘are so rigid that they are unworkable in the individual case’—for example, some programmes, such as ‘Building better relationships’, have waiting lists of more than 12 months.

More probation officers are therefore needed if more community sentencing is to be delivered.

The magistrates agreed short prison sentences are often counter-productive for many offenders and therefore should be treated as a last resort. However, they argued they are a useful deterrent for prolific shoplifters and offenders who refuse community options and should be retained.

Shabana Mahmood KC, the Lord Chancellor, was forced to release 1,100 prisoners early to ease overcrowding in October 2024, on the day she launched the Gauke review.

Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll