header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 July 2012 / Dermot Keating , Monica Stevenson
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Features , Company
printer mail-detail

Maintaining standards

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Dermot Keating & Monica Stevenson consider how unfair commercial practices are prosecuted

In May of this year, it was four years since the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (the regulations) came into force and in this time lawyers and trading standards officers alike have grappled with a piece of legislation most notable for its prolixity and complexity.

The regulations implemented an EU Directive (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive [2005/29/EC]) which sought to harmonise the approach of member states towards unfair commercial practices. Many critics have attributed their complexity to the fact that the regulations incorporated, virtually wholesale, the wording of the Directive. Recent case law shows some of the difficulties encountered by the UK courts when interpreting seemingly simple statutory terms (see for example R (on the application of Surrey Trading Standards) v Southern & Scottish Energy plc [2012] EWCA Crim 539, [2012] All ER (D) 164 (Mar), which saw the Court of Appeal consider who qualifies as a “trader” for the purpose of the regulations).

To date, there is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll