header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7524

24 July 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Jon Robins canvasses opinion on the post-LASPO future

Should the SFO rush in to prosecute banks over LIBOR, asks David Corker

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter discuss the correct approach to apportioning discrimination awards

Geraldine Morris on the approach to religion in family proceedings

How should the courts apply the Manual Handling Operations Regulations, asks Keith Patten

Richard Hinton explains the buzz around SearchFlow’s new website

Conserving history or restricting the future? Dean Bedford puts the National Trust under the spotlight

Dermot Keating & Monica Stevenson consider how unfair commercial practices are prosecuted

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

Caroline Kehoe & Joanne Keillor examine the consequences of an endeavours obligation on a long term contract

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll