header-logo header-logo

Chancery Lane says no to LeO

The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers

Consulting on its draft business plan and budget 2026–27, which closed responses this week, LeO proposed four potential budget increases including its recommended 12.1% boost.

Its other three proposals were for a 6.7%, 8.7% and 17.1% increase. It is also considering broader reforms including changes to its rules, as part of a Scheme Transformation Review.

LeO said it expects to resolve more than 10,000 complaints in the coming year, 57% more than in pre-pandemic years, and is under ‘serious pressure’ due to rising demand. It attributed the rise in complaints to ‘unacceptably high rates’ of ‘poor service’ in first-tier complaints handling, cost-of-living challenges prompting more people to complain, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology such as ChatGPT making it easier for people to lodge complaints.

Responding this week, however, the Law Society rejected LeO’s proposals.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘It is particularly concerning that LeO is proposing to undertake additional work such as a Scheme Transformation Review while struggling to deliver its core statutory function of resolving complaints quickly.

‘We urge LeO to focus on operational efficiency, explore outsourcing and automation.’

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) said it accepts LeO’s recommended budget increase ‘with great reluctance and significant reservations’. The CLC said it has ‘ongoing concerns about operational efficiency and whether… LeO represents value for money’ but accepts that the increase is ‘necessary to avoid deterioration in service levels and turnaround times for consumers’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
back-to-top-scroll