header-logo header-logo

Chancery Lane says no to LeO

The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers

Consulting on its draft business plan and budget 2026–27, which closed responses this week, LeO proposed four potential budget increases including its recommended 12.1% boost.

Its other three proposals were for a 6.7%, 8.7% and 17.1% increase. It is also considering broader reforms including changes to its rules, as part of a Scheme Transformation Review.

LeO said it expects to resolve more than 10,000 complaints in the coming year, 57% more than in pre-pandemic years, and is under ‘serious pressure’ due to rising demand. It attributed the rise in complaints to ‘unacceptably high rates’ of ‘poor service’ in first-tier complaints handling, cost-of-living challenges prompting more people to complain, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology such as ChatGPT making it easier for people to lodge complaints.

Responding this week, however, the Law Society rejected LeO’s proposals.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘It is particularly concerning that LeO is proposing to undertake additional work such as a Scheme Transformation Review while struggling to deliver its core statutory function of resolving complaints quickly.

‘We urge LeO to focus on operational efficiency, explore outsourcing and automation.’

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) said it accepts LeO’s recommended budget increase ‘with great reluctance and significant reservations’. The CLC said it has ‘ongoing concerns about operational efficiency and whether… LeO represents value for money’ but accepts that the increase is ‘necessary to avoid deterioration in service levels and turnaround times for consumers’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll