header-logo header-logo

Chancery Lane says no to LeO

The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers

Consulting on its draft business plan and budget 2026–27, which closed responses this week, LeO proposed four potential budget increases including its recommended 12.1% boost.

Its other three proposals were for a 6.7%, 8.7% and 17.1% increase. It is also considering broader reforms including changes to its rules, as part of a Scheme Transformation Review.

LeO said it expects to resolve more than 10,000 complaints in the coming year, 57% more than in pre-pandemic years, and is under ‘serious pressure’ due to rising demand. It attributed the rise in complaints to ‘unacceptably high rates’ of ‘poor service’ in first-tier complaints handling, cost-of-living challenges prompting more people to complain, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology such as ChatGPT making it easier for people to lodge complaints.

Responding this week, however, the Law Society rejected LeO’s proposals.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘It is particularly concerning that LeO is proposing to undertake additional work such as a Scheme Transformation Review while struggling to deliver its core statutory function of resolving complaints quickly.

‘We urge LeO to focus on operational efficiency, explore outsourcing and automation.’

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) said it accepts LeO’s recommended budget increase ‘with great reluctance and significant reservations’. The CLC said it has ‘ongoing concerns about operational efficiency and whether… LeO represents value for money’ but accepts that the increase is ‘necessary to avoid deterioration in service levels and turnaround times for consumers’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll