header-logo header-logo

Private eye

27 July 2012 / Tom Morrison
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail
istock_000001153004medium_4

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust has been handed the largest civil monetary penalty issued so far under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). At £325,000, this substantial fine was issued following the theft of computer hard drives containing confidential information relating to thousands of patients and staff in September 2010. Highly sensitive personal data was found on hard drives sold on eBay two months later. The data included details of patients’ medical conditions and treatment, disability living allowance forms and reports on children. It also included documents containing staff details such as National Insurance numbers, home addresses and information referring to criminal convictions and suspected offences.

Source of the information breach

It seems that the source of the breach was an individual engaged by the trust’s IT services provider which was supposed to securely destroy approximately 1,000 hard drives held in a secure room at Brighton General Hospital. Four of those hard drives made their way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll