27 July 2012 / Dr Jon Robins

Issue: 7524 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services

printer

mail-detail

What next?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jon Robins canvasses opinion on the post-LASPO future

“I genuinely believe ‘access to justice’ is the hallmark of a civilised society.” So said justice secretary, Ken Clarke, introducing his government’s legal aid reforms that, some 18 months later, became the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

Such an apparently unequivocal assertion rather begs the question, what would the coalition government have done to the legal aid system if the justice secretary wasn’t quite so committed to “access to justice”? LASPO, of course, was predicated on one idea above all others: that of removing £350m from a total £2.2bn scheme.

Debating access

The idea of “access to justice” was the subject of a panel debate I chaired this month at the House of Commons. It was organised by the JusticeGap, together with Hackney Community Law Centre (HCLC) and speakers included former justice secretary Lord Willy Bach, who led the opposition to the LASPO Bill in the House of Lords; Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and director of Justice; the human rights

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

What next?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jon Robins canvasses opinion on the post-LASPO future

“I genuinely believe ‘access to justice’ is the hallmark of a civilised society.” So said justice secretary, Ken Clarke, introducing his government’s legal aid reforms that, some 18 months later, became the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

Such an apparently unequivocal assertion rather begs the question, what would the coalition government have done to the legal aid system if the justice secretary wasn’t quite so committed to “access to justice”? LASPO, of course, was predicated on one idea above all others: that of removing £350m from a total £2.2bn scheme.

Debating access

The idea of “access to justice” was the subject of a panel debate I chaired this month at the House of Commons. It was organised by the JusticeGap, together with Hackney Community Law Centre (HCLC) and speakers included former justice secretary Lord Willy Bach, who led the opposition to the LASPO Bill in the House of Lords; Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and director of Justice; the human rights

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

back-to-top-scroll