header-logo header-logo

27 November 2014
Issue: 7632 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Maintenance of action

Rees and another v Gateley Wareing (a firm) and another [2014] EWCA Civ 1351, [2014] All ER (D) 289 (Oct)

The claimants retained the defendant solicitors firm in relation to a land transfer transaction. The terms of the retainer were finalised on 5 August 2002. A dispute arose and the judge held that the retainer had not obliged the defendant to conduct litigation and it was therefore enforcible. The claimants appealed. On appeal, the Court of Appeal held that as the work that the defendant had carried out was work carried by them in their capacity as solicitors, the retainer had been (or at least become) an agreement within the definition of conditional fee agreement in s 58 (2) of the 1990 Act and the defendant was not entitled to enforce the retainer agreement.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll