header-logo header-logo

12 August 2020
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession
printer mail-detail

Major Brexit report for lawyers

LexisNexis has published a free, comprehensive guide for lawyers on navigating the end of the Brexit transition process

The 103-page report, ‘Continental shift: navigating the Brexit transition’, includes insights and guidance on the impact on key practice areas such as data protection, corporate, commercial law, employment and intellectual property. The guide highlights useful information, materials and commentary for further reading throughout.

Key topics include the implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement, negotiation of the future UK-EU relationship, domestic policy and legislation, and preparation for the legal landscape beyond Brexit.

The transition period was considered ‘ambitious’ from the outset, and has been hampered further by the COVID-19 crisis, the report notes. The 1 July deadline for extending transition with the EU has passed. Any remaining procedures or policies for extending are ‘uncertain and open to debate’, it concludes. The report considers six potential legal routes for extension―all problematic. For example, some EU lawyers have suggested using Art 50 as a legal basis, although others argue this route was closed on Brexit day, 31 January 2020.

Nevertheless, the report quotes Professor Catherine Barnard, senior fellow at The UK in a Changing Europe: ‘Never rule out the ingenuity of EU lawyers if forced to come up with some imaginative solution on getting round the problem come autumn.’

Meanwhile, lawyers need to advise clients on continuing their business supply chains within WTO rules, except where trade deals exist. In January, it is likely the UK will have ‘third country’ status, incurring EU tariffs on goods and without access to the single market for goods and services, regulatory approval and recognition.

Priority targets for deals include the US, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Iceland and Lichtenstein. The UK is considering accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which includes some South American and Asian countries and Australia.

The report can be requested at: https://bit.ly/3gIuMJU.

Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll