header-logo header-logo

05 February 2016 / Camilla Fusco
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Making contact work

Camilla Fusco provides guidance for putting in place successful contact arrangements

Most family law practitioners will have experience of making applications for child arrangement orders (CAOs) which regulate the arrangements concerning whom a child will spend time with and when (formerly contact). However, advising clients about the most effective remedies for enforcement of such orders (referred to here as “contact orders”) can be far more difficult. This article examines the powers and sanctions available to the court in contact cases.

Background

The family courts have faced criticism from some as being slow to enforce court orders in child contact cases. Often the concern for judges (and clients) is that the enforcement route may increase the level of conflict and impact adversely on the child. A report published in December 2013 by Exeter University entitled Enforcing contact orders—problem-solving or punishment? (Liz Trinder, Joan Hunt, Alison Macleod, Julia Pearce, Hilary Woodward) analysed a nationally representative sample of 215 enforcement applications and reached some interesting conclusions:

  1. Although the public perception is that enforcement problems stem from implacably hostile mothers
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll