header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Paula Jefferson
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Limitation
printer mail-detail

Making history

Hoare could be a catalyst for further changes to limitation restrictions, says Paula Jefferson

 

As had been widely anticipated (see NLJ, 18 January 2008, pp 84–85), the House of Lords departed from its previous decision in Stubbings v Webb [1993] AC 498, [1993] 1 All ER 322 when it handed down judgment in the appeals of A v Hoare and other appeals [2008] UKHL 8, [2008] All ER (D) 251 (Jan) concerning limitation in assault and abuse cases. In Hoare, the House of Lords considered the historical development of the law of limitation in the context of personal injury claims. The need to reconsider limitation in these cases arose because under Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), s 2, as had been held in Stubbings, the limitation period was a fixed six years. The claimants argued that this was an anomaly and their claims for personal injury, albeit caused by a deliberate assault, should be dealt with as for any other injury.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll