header-logo header-logo

Making a new UK

19 July 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7802_pigott

Legislating for Brexit: Charles Pigott provides a brief overview of the EU Withdrawal Act

  • Charts the progression of each stage of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
  • It remains unclear what the UK’s future relationship with the EU will look like.

The first substantive Brexit Act—the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018)—received royal assent on 26 June 2018. Although it may need some adjustment as negotiations with the EU progress, EU(W)A 2018 will continue to provide the structural repairs needed keep the UK’s legal edifice standing after it leaves the EU.

There is a great deal of detail buried in its 100 or so pages, but the basic architecture of EU(W)A 2018 is fairly easy to discern. It follows a logical progression, outlined below, which has not changed significantly since it was introduced to the Commons last year.

Stage 1

Repeal the European Communities Act 1972

Section 1 of the EU(W)A 2018 provides: ‘The European Communities Act 1972 (ECA 1972) is repealed on exit day.’ Depending on one’s perspective, this short sentence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll