header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 July 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Making a new UK

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7802_pigott

Legislating for Brexit: Charles Pigott provides a brief overview of the EU Withdrawal Act

  • Charts the progression of each stage of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
  • It remains unclear what the UK’s future relationship with the EU will look like.

The first substantive Brexit Act—the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018)—received royal assent on 26 June 2018. Although it may need some adjustment as negotiations with the EU progress, EU(W)A 2018 will continue to provide the structural repairs needed keep the UK’s legal edifice standing after it leaves the EU.

There is a great deal of detail buried in its 100 or so pages, but the basic architecture of EU(W)A 2018 is fairly easy to discern. It follows a logical progression, outlined below, which has not changed significantly since it was introduced to the Commons last year.

Stage 1

Repeal the European Communities Act 1972

Section 1 of the EU(W)A 2018 provides: ‘The European Communities Act 1972 (ECA 1972) is repealed on exit day.’ Depending on one’s perspective, this short sentence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll