header-logo header-logo

15 April 2026
Issue: 8157 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Online safety , Social Media , Liability , Compliance , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Making tech execs criminally liable

The government has warned tech executives that they may face personal criminal liability where their platforms fail to remove non-consensual intimate images within 48 hours

The reform is one of several government amendments tabled to the Crime and Policing Bill last week. Corker Binning partner Henrietta Ronson said it marked ‘a significant step.

‘It shifts the burden away from victims onto those with operational control which is likely to drive faster and more robust compliance. However, many of the relevant decision makers are based outside the UK and territorial jurisdiction and enforceability will constrain reach.

‘Its practical impact will be limited and the measure if passed may be more symbolic than substantive.’

Other amendments tackle pornography featuring incestuous conduct and pornography where an adult roleplays as a child, punishable by up to five years in prison.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll