header-logo header-logo

15 April 2026
Issue: 8157 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Online safety , Social Media , Liability , Compliance , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Making tech execs criminally liable

The government has warned tech executives that they may face personal criminal liability where their platforms fail to remove non-consensual intimate images within 48 hours

The reform is one of several government amendments tabled to the Crime and Policing Bill last week. Corker Binning partner Henrietta Ronson said it marked ‘a significant step.

‘It shifts the burden away from victims onto those with operational control which is likely to drive faster and more robust compliance. However, many of the relevant decision makers are based outside the UK and territorial jurisdiction and enforceability will constrain reach.

‘Its practical impact will be limited and the measure if passed may be more symbolic than substantive.’

Other amendments tackle pornography featuring incestuous conduct and pornography where an adult roleplays as a child, punishable by up to five years in prison.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll