header-logo header-logo

15 April 2026
Issue: 8157 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Online safety , Social Media , Liability , Compliance , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Making tech execs criminally liable

The government has warned tech executives that they may face personal criminal liability where their platforms fail to remove non-consensual intimate images within 48 hours

The reform is one of several government amendments tabled to the Crime and Policing Bill last week. Corker Binning partner Henrietta Ronson said it marked ‘a significant step.

‘It shifts the burden away from victims onto those with operational control which is likely to drive faster and more robust compliance. However, many of the relevant decision makers are based outside the UK and territorial jurisdiction and enforceability will constrain reach.

‘Its practical impact will be limited and the measure if passed may be more symbolic than substantive.’

Other amendments tackle pornography featuring incestuous conduct and pornography where an adult roleplays as a child, punishable by up to five years in prison.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll