header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Dominic Zammit
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Profession , Marketing , Technology
printer mail-detail

Managing your brand (Pt 2)

nlj_7739_zammit

Uberisation of the legal sector is closer than you think, says Dominic Zammit

Picture this. Virtual reality meetings, automatically tracked against client records. Relationships managed online through dedicated client “rooms” within the firm’s practice management hub. Software that tracks work in real time through wearable devices, enabling clients to see what each member of their legal team is working on, monitoring efficiency and expenditure.

Sound like a nightmare? Well, maybe. But it’s almost certainly a glimpse into the future of legal practice. And we’re not talking 50 years either—more like five or perhaps ten.

Tech juggernaut

The technological juggernaut is unstoppable. The last decade has delivered nothing short of a revolution in consumerism and now the lines between professional and personal are becoming increasingly blurred. We want the same service from our law firm as we receive from Amazon. Fast, efficient, transparent, customer driven. Not words traditionally associated with the legal sector.

To meet changing customer expectations, law firms need to do more than invest cash (although of course this is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll