header-logo header-logo

Mandatory mediation scrapped for separating couples

29 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail
Ministers have scrapped plans for compulsory mediation and will pilot early legal advice instead—a decision welcomed by family lawyers

In its March 2023 consultation, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposed making mediation mandatory for separating couples prior to making a court application, supporting earlier resolution of private family law arrangements.

Issuing its official consultation response last week, however, the MoJ abandoned mandatory mediation and announced a pilot on legal advice specifically designed for parents and carers having difficulties agreeing their child arrangements.

The MoJ will also extend its private law Pathfinder pilot to South-East Wales and Birmingham, and roll it out to all courts nationally. Pathfinder, launched in 2022, facilitates information-sharing between police, local authorities, courts and other agencies, and it allows judges to request more documentation before a case gets to court.

Welcoming the about-turn, family lawyer and NLJ columnist David Burrows said: ‘To force parties to mediate is illogical.’

Peter Burgess, partner at Burgess Mee Family Law, welcomed the return of early legal advice, which, he says, ‘was swept away with the LASPO [Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012] reforms ten years ago.

‘Early legal advice has to be a vital part of keeping family conflicts out of court and easing the burden on judges, who often have to explain the law to litigants in person. It remains to be seen exactly how this scheme will be implemented or who will be eligible, and there will be a long, hard road ahead to rebuild a family justice system which is fit for purpose once more.’

Resolution committee member Jo Edwards, head of family at Forsters, said: ‘There is plenty of evidence to show the connection between couples receiving early legal advice and resolving issues on separation, in turn freeing up court time for the most needy cases (involving safeguarding issues or vulnerable people).

‘Mediation can be extremely effective, but it’s not right for every couple and works best when it is entered into voluntarily. The proposals also risked making victims of domestic abuse feel that they had no option but to go into mediation.’

Deborah Jeff, partner, Simkins, said: ‘It is eminently sensible that the government has listened to the feedback of solicitors and mediators. Parties must come to mediation feeling safe and with parity of power.’

Law Society vice president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Having the conversation early could mean a dispute is settled sooner.’

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll