header-logo header-logo

29 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Mandatory mediation scrapped for separating couples

Ministers have scrapped plans for compulsory mediation and will pilot early legal advice instead—a decision welcomed by family lawyers

In its March 2023 consultation, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposed making mediation mandatory for separating couples prior to making a court application, supporting earlier resolution of private family law arrangements.

Issuing its official consultation response last week, however, the MoJ abandoned mandatory mediation and announced a pilot on legal advice specifically designed for parents and carers having difficulties agreeing their child arrangements.

The MoJ will also extend its private law Pathfinder pilot to South-East Wales and Birmingham, and roll it out to all courts nationally. Pathfinder, launched in 2022, facilitates information-sharing between police, local authorities, courts and other agencies, and it allows judges to request more documentation before a case gets to court.

Welcoming the about-turn, family lawyer and NLJ columnist David Burrows said: ‘To force parties to mediate is illogical.’

Peter Burgess, partner at Burgess Mee Family Law, welcomed the return of early legal advice, which, he says, ‘was swept away with the LASPO [Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012] reforms ten years ago.

‘Early legal advice has to be a vital part of keeping family conflicts out of court and easing the burden on judges, who often have to explain the law to litigants in person. It remains to be seen exactly how this scheme will be implemented or who will be eligible, and there will be a long, hard road ahead to rebuild a family justice system which is fit for purpose once more.’

Resolution committee member Jo Edwards, head of family at Forsters, said: ‘There is plenty of evidence to show the connection between couples receiving early legal advice and resolving issues on separation, in turn freeing up court time for the most needy cases (involving safeguarding issues or vulnerable people).

‘Mediation can be extremely effective, but it’s not right for every couple and works best when it is entered into voluntarily. The proposals also risked making victims of domestic abuse feel that they had no option but to go into mediation.’

Deborah Jeff, partner, Simkins, said: ‘It is eminently sensible that the government has listened to the feedback of solicitors and mediators. Parties must come to mediation feeling safe and with parity of power.’

Law Society vice president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Having the conversation early could mean a dispute is settled sooner.’

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Ward Hadaway partner becomes bicentennial president following regional merger

Devonshires—four promotions

Devonshires—four promotions

Firm promotes four senior associates to partner in annual round

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Co-heads of dispute resolution practice appointed alongside partner promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll