header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Manifesto for justice

A coalition of legal aid organisations and professional bodies has published “A Manifesto for Justice” ahead of the General Election.

It reads: “The justice system underpins the principles of liberty and democracy, the rule of law, and our human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“Justice is precious. The price we pay for it should reflect the value we place on living in a just and ordered society.”

According to the coalition, changes introduced in this parliament have meant: 400,000 more people denied access to legal aid; a 30% increase in people representing themselves in court; challenging unlawful government decisions restricted to the wealthy; and individual rights and freedoms threatened by surveillance laws. 

They call on whoever forms a government in May to restore legal aid to areas removed from scope by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), scrap recent reforms to judicial review and provide proper oversight of surveillance powers introduced by anti-terrorism laws.

Alistair MacDonald QC, chairman of the Bar, says: “Politicians think justice, in the broader sense, yields insufficient political capital. 

“And why shouldn’t they? Voters have for years taken access to justice for granted as an immutable part of our heritage and the established order. But for how much longer will they so do?”

Nimrod Ben Cnaan, head of policy and profile, Law Centres Network said legal aid cuts had “been so severe that even the remaining help is not functioning properly. The price is too dear: without access to legal assistance, people suffer unfairness and ultimately injustice; these blight their lives, deepen inequality and undermine the rule of law. We must ensure that justice is accessible to those who need it most.”

Earlier this month, legal aid lawyers launched a Manifesto for Legal Aid, calling on the government to “immediately review” LASPO.

 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll