header-logo header-logo

28 June 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

March of the unregulated legal sector

The for-profit unregulated legal services sector may account for up to 9% of the market for individuals and 39% of the market for SMEs, researchers have found

Its biggest market is in personal injury, conveyancing, will-writing, tax, trading, and employee issues.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) published its study, Mapping unregulated legal services, this week. As well as charting the scale of the sector, it found their services were generally cheaper, with will-writing typically charged on a fixed price basis and flight compensation claims as a percentage success fee.

However, clients of the unregulated sector were more likely to report dissatisfaction, and some case studies uncovered instances of errors in documents and unexpected costs.

Moreover, clients of unregulated providers do not have access to redress through the Legal Ombudsman or to specific regulators such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority or Bar Standards Board.

LSB chief executive Matthew Hill said: ‘We must strike the right balance between increasing access to justice and protecting consumers.

‘We will weigh the findings from the research with a range of other insights and evidence as we consider whether changes to the scope of regulations are warranted in the future.’

However, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘This research confirms the consumer benefits of using regulated providers.

‘Reservation should be considered in a mixture of possible measures for high-risk areas where there is increased evidence of consumer harm, such as will-writing, estate administration, Lasting Powers of Attorney and trusts. With an increasingly aging population, these areas call for regulatory attention to ensure that vulnerable people – particularly those with mental incapacity – are sufficiently protected.

‘We are still concerned about the public’s confusion about the difference between regulated and unregulated providers. Consumers must be made aware of the limited redress available from unregulated providers compared to the substantial redress available from regulated providers.’
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll