header-logo header-logo

Marine insurance

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Global Process Systems Inc and another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2011] UKSC 5, [2011] All ER (D) 10 (Feb)

The question of proximate cause of a loss was one of fact, to be decided on common sense principles. All or virtually all goods were susceptible to loss or damage from the fortuities of the weather on a voyage; that did not mean that such loss or damage arose from the nature of the goods; it arose from the fact that the goods had encountered one of the perils of the seas. It was a matter of “common sense” judgment whether initial unfitness or the intervention of a subsequent peril or both was or were the proximate causes.

Although the meaning of inherent vice would be the same in principle under all marine policies, its application in any particular case had to depend upon the nature and characteristics of the goods being insured and of the insured venture
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll