header-logo header-logo

Marine insurance

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Global Process Systems Inc and another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2011] UKSC 5, [2011] All ER (D) 10 (Feb)

The question of proximate cause of a loss was one of fact, to be decided on common sense principles. All or virtually all goods were susceptible to loss or damage from the fortuities of the weather on a voyage; that did not mean that such loss or damage arose from the nature of the goods; it arose from the fact that the goods had encountered one of the perils of the seas. It was a matter of “common sense” judgment whether initial unfitness or the intervention of a subsequent peril or both was or were the proximate causes.

Although the meaning of inherent vice would be the same in principle under all marine policies, its application in any particular case had to depend upon the nature and characteristics of the goods being insured and of the insured venture
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll