header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Marine insurance

Global Process Systems Inc and another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2011] UKSC 5, [2011] All ER (D) 10 (Feb)

The question of proximate cause of a loss was one of fact, to be decided on common sense principles. All or virtually all goods were susceptible to loss or damage from the fortuities of the weather on a voyage; that did not mean that such loss or damage arose from the nature of the goods; it arose from the fact that the goods had encountered one of the perils of the seas. It was a matter of “common sense” judgment whether initial unfitness or the intervention of a subsequent peril or both was or were the proximate causes.

Although the meaning of inherent vice would be the same in principle under all marine policies, its application in any particular case had to depend upon the nature and characteristics of the goods being insured and of the insured venture
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll