header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Marine insurance

Argo Systems FZE v Liberty Insurance (PTE) and another [2011] EWHC 301 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 239 (Feb)

Pursuant to s 34(3) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906, a breach of warranty might be waived by the insurer. Unlike in the case of non-disclosure or misrepresentation, where the insurer had a choice whether to avoid or affirm a policy, a breach of warranty operated automatically to discharge the policy.

Any waiver of such a breach therefore required an estoppel. Accordingly, the claimant had to establish (a) representation (whether by words or conduct) to the effect that the first defendant was not relying on the breach of warranty defence, and (b) such reliance by the claimant on that representation as would render it unfair or unconscionable for the first defendant to be permitted to go back on it later.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll