header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008 / Timothy Millett
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , EU
printer mail-detail

A marked improvement

Timothy Millett reviews the EU's high-speed reference procedure

On 1 March 2008, the Court of Justice of the European Communities introduced a new high-speed preliminary ruling procedure. It is available only for references in the area of freedom, security and justice. Within that field, it makes radical changes to the normal preliminary ruling procedure.

Scope

An enabling provision was introduced as Art 23a in the Statute of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 42). The new procedure itself was established by an amendment to Art 9 and the introduction of a new Art 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 39). It is called the “urgent procedure”.

This new high-speed procedure is available only for references for a preliminary ruling in the areas covered by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) or Title IV of Part III of the EC Treaty (ECT).

Title VI TEU comprises provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It covers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll