header-logo header-logo

A marked improvement

15 May 2008 / Timothy Millett
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , EU
printer mail-detail

Timothy Millett reviews the EU's high-speed reference procedure

On 1 March 2008, the Court of Justice of the European Communities introduced a new high-speed preliminary ruling procedure. It is available only for references in the area of freedom, security and justice. Within that field, it makes radical changes to the normal preliminary ruling procedure.

Scope

An enabling provision was introduced as Art 23a in the Statute of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 42). The new procedure itself was established by an amendment to Art 9 and the introduction of a new Art 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 39). It is called the “urgent procedure”.

This new high-speed procedure is available only for references for a preliminary ruling in the areas covered by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) or Title IV of Part III of the EC Treaty (ECT).

Title VI TEU comprises provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It covers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll