header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008 / Timothy Millett
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , EU
printer mail-detail

A marked improvement

Timothy Millett reviews the EU's high-speed reference procedure

On 1 March 2008, the Court of Justice of the European Communities introduced a new high-speed preliminary ruling procedure. It is available only for references in the area of freedom, security and justice. Within that field, it makes radical changes to the normal preliminary ruling procedure.

Scope

An enabling provision was introduced as Art 23a in the Statute of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 42). The new procedure itself was established by an amendment to Art 9 and the introduction of a new Art 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 39). It is called the “urgent procedure”.

This new high-speed procedure is available only for references for a preliminary ruling in the areas covered by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) or Title IV of Part III of the EC Treaty (ECT).

Title VI TEU comprises provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It covers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll