header-logo header-logo

A marked improvement

15 May 2008 / Timothy Millett
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , EU
printer mail-detail

Timothy Millett reviews the EU's high-speed reference procedure

On 1 March 2008, the Court of Justice of the European Communities introduced a new high-speed preliminary ruling procedure. It is available only for references in the area of freedom, security and justice. Within that field, it makes radical changes to the normal preliminary ruling procedure.

Scope

An enabling provision was introduced as Art 23a in the Statute of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 42). The new procedure itself was established by an amendment to Art 9 and the introduction of a new Art 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice (OJ 2008 L 24, p 39). It is called the “urgent procedure”.

This new high-speed procedure is available only for references for a preliminary ruling in the areas covered by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) or Title IV of Part III of the EC Treaty (ECT).

Title VI TEU comprises provisions on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It covers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll