header-logo header-logo

26 May 2023 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Features , Tort , Damages
printer mail-detail

Market impact: what’s recoverable?

123324
How can the courts determine the extent of economic loss due to financial downturns in a tort claim? Ian Gascoigne discusses the challenges of striking the right balance
  • In tort, a court’s task is to determine objectively the types of loss that would foreseeably be anticipated at the time that the breach of duty happened.
  • Having to assess whether a falling market is within the scope of the particular duty of care affords the judge an effective check.

Quantifying the recovery under a claim for economic loss following breach of a duty of care in tort is difficult. The breach can push the victim into a set of dramatic consequences.

In resolving such claims, judges have two roles. The first is to establish a dividing line on the facts; and the second, for higher courts, is to set out a workable principle for future reference. Courts can address a victim’s financial recovery in terms of a combination of arguments over the scope of the duty, causation, remoteness and (sometimes) contributory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll