header-logo header-logo

Market impact: what’s recoverable?

26 May 2023 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Features , Tort , Damages
printer mail-detail
123324
How can the courts determine the extent of economic loss due to financial downturns in a tort claim? Ian Gascoigne discusses the challenges of striking the right balance
  • In tort, a court’s task is to determine objectively the types of loss that would foreseeably be anticipated at the time that the breach of duty happened.
  • Having to assess whether a falling market is within the scope of the particular duty of care affords the judge an effective check.

Quantifying the recovery under a claim for economic loss following breach of a duty of care in tort is difficult. The breach can push the victim into a set of dramatic consequences.

In resolving such claims, judges have two roles. The first is to establish a dividing line on the facts; and the second, for higher courts, is to set out a workable principle for future reference. Courts can address a victim’s financial recovery in terms of a combination of arguments over the scope of the duty, causation, remoteness and (sometimes) contributory negligence.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll