header-logo header-logo

Divorcing farmers—married to the farm?

02 July 2021 / Hannah Porter
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
52125
Hannah Porter explains why there can be so many complications for divorcing farming couples
  • Depending on individual circumstances, going through the divorce process can be relatively straightforward or incredibly complex. Usually in the latter camp are farming families, whose assets often require a good deal of untangling, and whose future financial situation is inextricably linked to the consequences of Brexit.

In any divorce, financial claims can include income, capital, property, pensions and claims against the business owned by either party. For farmers, their business is the family farm; financial aspects will encompass farming and management accounts, lending, income and expenditure plus evidence of ownership and even the boundary of the land.

Many farms involve farming families spanning generations, often living at close quarters. This can mean strong family ties, co-farming, tenancies, trusts and inheritance are in the mix. It’s perfectly possible that while a farm provides a home for the couple and their children, they may not actually own it. The ‘home’ might instead be owned by their parents

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll