header-logo header-logo

Divorcing farmers—married to the farm?

02 July 2021 / Hannah Porter
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
52125
Hannah Porter explains why there can be so many complications for divorcing farming couples
  • Depending on individual circumstances, going through the divorce process can be relatively straightforward or incredibly complex. Usually in the latter camp are farming families, whose assets often require a good deal of untangling, and whose future financial situation is inextricably linked to the consequences of Brexit.

In any divorce, financial claims can include income, capital, property, pensions and claims against the business owned by either party. For farmers, their business is the family farm; financial aspects will encompass farming and management accounts, lending, income and expenditure plus evidence of ownership and even the boundary of the land.

Many farms involve farming families spanning generations, often living at close quarters. This can mean strong family ties, co-farming, tenancies, trusts and inheritance are in the mix. It’s perfectly possible that while a farm provides a home for the couple and their children, they may not actually own it. The ‘home’ might instead be owned by their parents

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll