header-logo header-logo

02 July 2021 / Hannah Porter
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Divorcing farmers—married to the farm?

52125
Hannah Porter explains why there can be so many complications for divorcing farming couples
  • Depending on individual circumstances, going through the divorce process can be relatively straightforward or incredibly complex. Usually in the latter camp are farming families, whose assets often require a good deal of untangling, and whose future financial situation is inextricably linked to the consequences of Brexit.

In any divorce, financial claims can include income, capital, property, pensions and claims against the business owned by either party. For farmers, their business is the family farm; financial aspects will encompass farming and management accounts, lending, income and expenditure plus evidence of ownership and even the boundary of the land.

Many farms involve farming families spanning generations, often living at close quarters. This can mean strong family ties, co-farming, tenancies, trusts and inheritance are in the mix. It’s perfectly possible that while a farm provides a home for the couple and their children, they may not actually own it. The ‘home’ might instead be owned by their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll