header-logo header-logo

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Data protection , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Mass surveillance held unlawful

The UK’s mass surveillance regime breaches the right to privacy and freedom of expression, the European Court of Human Rights has held, in a landmark ruling.

The case, Big Brother Watch & Ors v UK (Applications 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) was brought against the UK government by Privacy International and 15 other applicants after whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed mass surveillance programmes by GCHQ in the UK and US intelligence agencies in 2013.

The decision adds a requirement of prior independent or judicial authorisation for bulk interception of data.

Ilia Siatitsa, acting legal director at Privacy International, said it was ‘an important win for privacy and freedom for everyone in the UK and beyond.

‘The court reiterated that intelligence agencies cannot act on their own, in secret and in the absence of authorisation and supervision by independent authorities.’

Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Data protection , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll