header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Matched Pairs

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
07 February 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Seamus Burns explores the legality of paired transplants

The announcement last October that two couples—Peter and Roma Horrell and an anonymous couple from Lothian—had participated in the first paired organ transplantation in the UK, heralds a welcome possible method for desperately ill patients receiving an organ in a transplantation system where demand for organs greatly exceeds the supply. Even though some 14.5 million people are registered with the NHS Organ Donor Register, UK Transplant, the organ matching and allocation organisation, estimates that more than 7,000 patients were listed as actively waiting for a transplant at the end of March 2007.

 
LEGALITY OF PAIRED TRANSPLANTS
The innovative practice of paired transplants is governed by the provisions of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (Persons who Lack Capacity to Consent and Transplants) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1659) (the regulations) which came into effect in September 2006. A paired donation is defined in the regulations and means an arrangement under which:
 
“(a) transplantable material is removed from a donor (D) for transplant to a person who
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll