header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 October 2015 / Lance M Dodgson
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A matter of interest

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Lance M Dodgson discusses recovering interest on special damages

Courts routinely award interest on special damages at eight per cent in personal injury matters despite case law advocating the adoption of the special account rate.

Given the inconsistent court practices, the appropriate award for interest can cause a number of difficulties for lawyers seeking to provide clear advice. In the current turbulent economic climate, interest can and does make a substantial difference to the amounts recovered on behalf of Claimants and must not be undervalued.

The inherent judicial power to award interest is contained in the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), s 35A, for High Court cases, and the County Court Act 1984 (CCA 1984), s 69, for county court cases. The SCA 1981 and CCA 1984 regrettably fail to provide any guidance on the rate and period concerning the award of interest. The courts however have a wide discretion to determine whether interest is to be awarded, the period of interest and the rate of interest. Case law states that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll