header-logo header-logo

A matter of life & death

02 March 2012 / Martin Smith
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Martin Smith explains why reforming archaic inquest laws is essential

Approaching half a million people die every year in the UK and the consequences of their death affect several times that number. Naturally, those affected by this brush with mortality often want to know how their spouse, partner, friend or relative died.

In its wisdom, the state helps answer this question through the medium of a coroner, employed by the local authority, who potentially holds office for life and dates her origins to about 1194 AD. This unusual character is neither Quincey nor Amanda Burton, cutting up bodies or getting too close to the grieving family. She is an over-burdened, often under-resourced judicial office holder who must certify death, conduct a fearless investigation into the facts, hold inquests, summon juries, navigate the complexities of a body of law where cases from Victorian times are cited, and face review in the administrative court. Coroners must do all these things without any official training.

Luckily, things are improving both for coroners and the bereaved.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll