header-logo header-logo

02 March 2012 / Martin Smith
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A matter of life & death

Martin Smith explains why reforming archaic inquest laws is essential

Approaching half a million people die every year in the UK and the consequences of their death affect several times that number. Naturally, those affected by this brush with mortality often want to know how their spouse, partner, friend or relative died.

In its wisdom, the state helps answer this question through the medium of a coroner, employed by the local authority, who potentially holds office for life and dates her origins to about 1194 AD. This unusual character is neither Quincey nor Amanda Burton, cutting up bodies or getting too close to the grieving family. She is an over-burdened, often under-resourced judicial office holder who must certify death, conduct a fearless investigation into the facts, hold inquests, summon juries, navigate the complexities of a body of law where cases from Victorian times are cited, and face review in the administrative court. Coroners must do all these things without any official training.

Luckily, things are improving both for coroners and the bereaved.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll