header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Matters of trust

The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009, explained by Malcolm Skinner

With the advent of the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 there will be a collective sigh of relief from students .

Or will there be?

While the Act may have received Royal Assent, it still has to be implemented which is not likely to happen until after the middle of 2010 so we will have to continue with the old law for the time being.

The old law is contained in common law and in the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 (PAA 1964) and provides that a future interest must vest (to prevent it being perpetually  inalienable) at common law, within a life or lives in being at the date of the disposition plus 21 years and under the Act, within a period of up to 80 years as specified or 21 years in the case of an option in respect of land.

In respect of the accumulation of income the permitted periods are:
l the lifetime of the grantor/settler.
l 21 years from their death.
l the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll