header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Matters of trust

The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009, explained by Malcolm Skinner

With the advent of the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 there will be a collective sigh of relief from students .

Or will there be?

While the Act may have received Royal Assent, it still has to be implemented which is not likely to happen until after the middle of 2010 so we will have to continue with the old law for the time being.

The old law is contained in common law and in the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 (PAA 1964) and provides that a future interest must vest (to prevent it being perpetually  inalienable) at common law, within a life or lives in being at the date of the disposition plus 21 years and under the Act, within a period of up to 80 years as specified or 21 years in the case of an option in respect of land.

In respect of the accumulation of income the permitted periods are:
l the lifetime of the grantor/settler.
l 21 years from their death.
l the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll