header-logo header-logo

19 January 2017
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

May sets out Brexit priorities

Prime minister confirms plans to leave single market & CJEU jurisdiction

Brexit means leaving the single market and leaving the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), Prime Minister Theresa May has confirmed.

In a major speech this week, May said the UK must be able to seek new trade deals elsewhere, and free to set “competitive tax rates”. The UK would either seek a new customs agreement or become an associate member of the customs union. May said there would be a “phased process of implementation”, but gave no indication of the time involved.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chairman of the Bar, said May’s speech underlined the importance of securing the best possible market access for the services sector, including legal services.

“Brexit must also deliver certainty for families and consumers,” he said.

“It is vital for UK citizens that judgments made in one country will be recognised and enforceable in another.”

Meanwhile, lawyers have raised questions about the future of civil justice co-operation with the EU once we leave the jurisdiction of the CJEU.

David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe, who is acting for Deir Dos Santos in the Art 50 case currently before the Supreme Court (to be decided on Tuesday 24 January), gave evidence on this subject to the House of Lords EU Justice Sub-Committee last week.

Writing in NLJ, Greene says many litigators would prefer the UK to “agree and adopt, on a reciprocal basis, the Brussels Regulation (recast) and the Service Regulation, sign up to Lugano II and we adopt into domestic law Rome I and Rome II...We have to advise the government that this is not a perfect regime but it is tried and tested and should be largely retained within a UK model.”

Greene also predicts that a lengthy transition period may be required. “It seems a tall order to be stuffing all this into a two-year timetable when it appears the government has yet to make up its mind what it wants,” he says.

“For this reason we will probably need a transition period with sunrise and sunset provisions; sunrise on Brexit and perhaps a sunset two years later giving four years from the Art 50 notice.”

Issue: 7730 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll