header-logo header-logo

09 May 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Technology , Media
printer mail-detail

Mean screen libel machine

Social media has added a whole new dimension to the challenges of determining the meaning of words, says Athelstane Aamodt

  • The social media user represents a new class of ‘ordinary reader’ to consider when determining the true meaning of statements.
  • Should social media companies be subject to regulation enforcing a legal duty of care on them with respect to their users?

Much of the practice of law is about determining the meanings of words. In some cases, for example, the focus will be on what a law is meant to mean, and in others the focus will be on what agreements made between parties are meant to mean. The area of law that is concerned perhaps more than any other about what words mean is defamation. The reason for this is obvious: for a statement to be capable of being defamatory, a court must first determine what the words actually mean.

Taking stock

The process of how courts decide what a statement means was the focus of the recent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll