header-logo header-logo

Mean screen libel machine

09 May 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Technology , Media
printer mail-detail

Social media has added a whole new dimension to the challenges of determining the meaning of words, says Athelstane Aamodt

  • The social media user represents a new class of ‘ordinary reader’ to consider when determining the true meaning of statements.
  • Should social media companies be subject to regulation enforcing a legal duty of care on them with respect to their users?

Much of the practice of law is about determining the meanings of words. In some cases, for example, the focus will be on what a law is meant to mean, and in others the focus will be on what agreements made between parties are meant to mean. The area of law that is concerned perhaps more than any other about what words mean is defamation. The reason for this is obvious: for a statement to be capable of being defamatory, a court must first determine what the words actually mean.

Taking stock

The process of how courts decide what a statement means was the focus of the recent Supreme

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll