header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The measure of injury

Part two: damages after physical and psychiatric injury, by Rehana Azib

The issue of assessment of damages arose in Gray v (1) Thames Trains Ltd (2) Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc) [2008] EWCA Civ 713, [2008] All ER (D) 326 (Jun). Gray, who had been involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail crash, appealed against a decision that he was not entitled to damages for loss of earnings due to the principle of ex turpi causa. Gray had suffered severe post traumatic stress disorder as a result of the crash and which had subsequently caused him to undergo a severe personality change. He later stabbed a stranger to death and was detained in a hospital under s 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983, after pleading guilty to manslaughter.

Gray claimed damages on the basis that he was not able to earn as much as he would have done but for the accident. While the defendant admitted liability for loss of earnings up to the date of manslaughter, liability for losses incurred thereafter was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll