header-logo header-logo

15 October 2019 / David Locke
Issue: 7860 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR , Health & safety , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Mediating medical disputes

Far from a flash in the pan, support for mediation in health sector disputes is on the rise, reports David Locke
  • Mediation is becoming an increasingly popular option in medical disputes, including in clinical negligence and withdrawal of treatment cases.

In his 2010 speech to the Civil Mediation Council National Conference, Lord Neuberger, then Master of the Rolls, emphasised the role of mediation as a new mechanism for resolving disputes, albeit not one which was intended to replace other established forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Even then he was very evidently a firm, if not devout, believer in the power of mediation. It would seem his faith deepened, and almost exactly five years later, once again delivering a lecture to the same body, he recalled how mediation had initially been perceived as a ‘trendy’ idea without substance, and even in 2015 still had a credibility gap with some practitioners. However, Lord Neuberger suggested his audience should ‘be pretty uninhibited about supporting the idea of mediation in civil

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll