header-logo header-logo

05 July 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Mediation , Child law
printer mail-detail

Mediation: 50 years after Finer

180621
How is the law serving single parents & their children? David Burrows considers a half-century of reforms
  • The 1974 Finer report of the Committee on One-Parent Families aimed to improve the lives of single parents and their children.
  • This article considers the report’s recommendations and the legislative reforms that have taken place since—in particular, the court’s powers to order parties to engage in mediation.

It is June as I write; and finally, after 50 years and more, mediation is ‘busting out all over’, including in the Court of Appeal and in the Family Division. How did we get here? Why has it taken so long since the first Finer report thoughts of ‘conciliation’ in 1974 and the first conciliation service in Bristol in the late 1970s? And what of those 50 years since 1974?

On 2 July 1974, the report of the Committee on One-Parent Families, July 1974, Cmnd 5629, chaired by Sir Morris Finer, was published. Its recommendations were designed to alter for the better the lives of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll