header-logo header-logo

Mediation: 50 years after Finer

05 July 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Mediation , Child law
printer mail-detail
180621
How is the law serving single parents & their children? David Burrows considers a half-century of reforms
  • The 1974 Finer report of the Committee on One-Parent Families aimed to improve the lives of single parents and their children.
  • This article considers the report’s recommendations and the legislative reforms that have taken place since—in particular, the court’s powers to order parties to engage in mediation.

It is June as I write; and finally, after 50 years and more, mediation is ‘busting out all over’, including in the Court of Appeal and in the Family Division. How did we get here? Why has it taken so long since the first Finer report thoughts of ‘conciliation’ in 1974 and the first conciliation service in Bristol in the late 1970s? And what of those 50 years since 1974?

On 2 July 1974, the report of the Committee on One-Parent Families, July 1974, Cmnd 5629, chaired by Sir Morris Finer, was published. Its recommendations were designed to alter for the better the lives of single

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll