header-logo header-logo

Mediation: 50 years after Finer

05 July 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Mediation , Child law
printer mail-detail
180621
How is the law serving single parents & their children? David Burrows considers a half-century of reforms
  • The 1974 Finer report of the Committee on One-Parent Families aimed to improve the lives of single parents and their children.
  • This article considers the report’s recommendations and the legislative reforms that have taken place since—in particular, the court’s powers to order parties to engage in mediation.

It is June as I write; and finally, after 50 years and more, mediation is ‘busting out all over’, including in the Court of Appeal and in the Family Division. How did we get here? Why has it taken so long since the first Finer report thoughts of ‘conciliation’ in 1974 and the first conciliation service in Bristol in the late 1970s? And what of those 50 years since 1974?

On 2 July 1974, the report of the Committee on One-Parent Families, July 1974, Cmnd 5629, chaired by Sir Morris Finer, was published. Its recommendations were designed to alter for the better the lives of single

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll