header-logo header-logo

Mediation: a better route to a good settlement?

15 December 2017 / Caroline Bowden
Issue: 7774 / Categories: Features , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7774_bowden

Solicitors & mediators should work in tandem, says Caroline Bowden​.

  • Mediators should draft consent orders, or to an equivalent level of detail, at the end of financial mediations.
  • Mediators need robust standards throughout to enable coherent, balanced and certain settlement proposals to be turned into a legally binding outcome.
  • The Government’s review of LASPO has the opportunity to embed this as a culture change, to reverse some of the current problems.

The Family Mediation Council (FMC) decided at the beginning of 2017 to put out three questions for consultation:

  • Would the role of a mediator as an impartial third party in mediation be jeopardised by that mediator drafting a consent order, once a mediated agreement has been reached?
  • Is it possible to draft a consent order without giving advice on its terms?
  • Is it appropriate to draft a consent order without giving parties advice on its terms?

At the end of the year, they reported on the rather obvious conclusion that the consultation ‘did not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll