header-logo header-logo

26 March 2015
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mediation for costs disputes

The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has launched a mediation service solely dedicated to resolving costs disputes. Former senior costs judge Peter Hurst, former president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers Frances McCarthy, and three costs lawyers are among the group of eight mediators offering what the ACL believes is the first service of its kind. It will initially offer telephone and face-to-face mediation and will be expanded to include early neutral evaluation, arbitration, and multi-case mediation.

ACL chairman Sue Nash says: “Despite the steady growth of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in recent years, its application to costs disputes has generally been overlooked.” Nash says there are many reasons to engage in costs ADR, including the threat of costs sanctions for failing to engage in ADR, which she says is becoming more and more prevalent.

“It can improve key performance indicators such as reducing claim life cycles and the legal costs of settlement. It can free time to spend on routine matters to help meet performance standards and improve cash flow by earlier conversion of work in progress to cash.”

Issue: 7646 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll