header-logo header-logo

02 April 2009 / Mr Justice Briggs
Issue: 7363 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Mediation privilege?

Part 1: Mr Justice Briggs on the search for a proportionate way of ensuring confidentiality in mediation

The first thing which a mediator usually says to the parties when they gather together in one room at the beginning of a typical mediation is something along these lines: “Everything that takes place today is absolutely confidential. You may make offers to each other and you may unburden yourselves to me about the strengths and weaknesses of your case, and about your hopes and fears in relation to the litigation, secure in the knowledge that nothing said today can be repeated in the outside world or, in particular, in court if today's process does not lead to a settlement.”

That this is what is said not merely in this country, but all round Europe if not all round the world, is reflected in recital 23 in the EU Directive on Mediation.

“Confidentiality in the mediation process is important and this Directive should therefore provide for a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules with regard to how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll