header-logo header-logo

02 April 2009 / Mr Justice Briggs
Issue: 7363 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Mediation privilege?

Part 1: Mr Justice Briggs on the search for a proportionate way of ensuring confidentiality in mediation

The first thing which a mediator usually says to the parties when they gather together in one room at the beginning of a typical mediation is something along these lines: “Everything that takes place today is absolutely confidential. You may make offers to each other and you may unburden yourselves to me about the strengths and weaknesses of your case, and about your hopes and fears in relation to the litigation, secure in the knowledge that nothing said today can be repeated in the outside world or, in particular, in court if today's process does not lead to a settlement.”

That this is what is said not merely in this country, but all round Europe if not all round the world, is reflected in recital 23 in the EU Directive on Mediation.

“Confidentiality in the mediation process is important and this Directive should therefore provide for a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules with regard to how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll