header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mediation training

The new president of the Association of District Judges (ADJ) has called for all district judges to be trained in mediation.

Judge Monty Trent, ADJ president, says: “It is high time for mediation and other alternative dispute resolution techniques to be part of the armoury of every civil court in higher value cases.

“Instead of private or court-annexed mediation, district judges should be trained as mediators and employ their skills in achieving settlements.

In heavy civil litigation where the parties have been unable to negotiate a settlement within three months of proceedings having commenced, judges should be able to call the parties in for a neutral evaluation in the same way we do in family cases.

Judges are highly experienced lawyers with many years of successful practice behind them. Above all they are trusted neutrals and the ideal people to sit down with the parties themselves and help them resolve their disputes.”

Judge Trent, who sits at the Mayor’s and City of London Court and was formerly based at West London and Barnet county courts, has been a full time judge for 18 years. He intends to press for legislation to make civil enforcement machinery more effective.

Describing current systems of enforcement as a “mess”, he said: “One of the great weaknesses of the court system is its failure effectively to enforce its own court orders.”

He also expressed concern about the “dilapidated” state of county court buildings.

Curbs on justice expenditure, dilapidated courts and heavy staff turnover meant the system was “beginning to creak alarmingly”, he warned, with regular complaints of delays, mistakes and missing files.
“We can expect more court closures impeding the public’s access to local justice in cases that can sometimes change peoples’ lives as, if not more, fundamentally than a prison sentence.

“Courts are confronted with heavy staff turnover and constant cuts. As staff leave, they are rarely replaced. This leads to inexperience and sometimes illness. Remaining staff struggle to cope with a mountain of paper and work.”

 

Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll