header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Medical treatment

An NHS trust v H and others [2012] Lexis Citation 82, [2012] All ER (D) 110 (Oct)

While an involved and capacitous parent might be better placed to express views that assisted in assessing best interests than one who was less involved or capacitous, that was a matter of evidence and not one of principle. Parents who lacked capacity might still make telling points about welfare and it would be wrong to discount the weight to be attached to their views simply because of incapacity. It was the validity of the views that mattered, not the capacity of the person that held them.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll