header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Medical treatment

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v MH [2015] EWHC 1920 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 43 (Jul)

The Family Division, in an emergency application by the applicant NHS Trust held that it was in the child’s best interests to withhold invasive ventilation despite the wishes of the parent to have such treatment administered.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
Read All
Hate crimes fast-tracked by CPS
Prosecutors will speed up preparations for charging hate crimes, under Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) guidance issued in response to the surge in antisemitic incidents
Devolving more control over justice issues leads to better results, research shows
Improvements to courts, tribunals and the wider justice system in the north are being held back by a lack of national and local collaboration, according to thinktank JUSTICE North
Prison blunder puts child at risk
A family judge has criticised the prison authorities for mistakenly freeing a father who abducted his own son
Legal aid firms left in limbo for a year
The Law Society has renewed its calls for compensation for legal aid firms affected by the cyber-attack on the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)
Failure to prevent bribery win for Serious Fraud Office
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has secured a £10m penalty plus £4.8m in costs from manufacturer Ultra Electronics Holdings, under the terms of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) for failure to prevent bribery
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll