MASM v MMAM and others [2015] EWCOP 3, [2015] All ER (D) 238 (Jan)
The applicant and first respondent acted contrary to a best interests declaration made by the Court of Protection. The court held that acting contrary to a declaration could not trigger contempt proceedings. It gave guidance on the correct approach of the parties and the court to orders made under s 16 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=3f38efa6_1)
Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care
DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft
Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team
Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application
