MASM v MMAM and others [2015] EWCOP 3, [2015] All ER (D) 238 (Jan)
The applicant and first respondent acted contrary to a best interests declaration made by the Court of Protection. The court held that acting contrary to a declaration could not trigger contempt proceedings. It gave guidance on the correct approach of the parties and the court to orders made under s 16 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
