header-logo header-logo

Mental Health

04 April 2014
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

TW v Enfield Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 362, [2014] All ER (D) 292 (Mar)

As a matter of construction of s 11(4) of the Mental Health Act 1983, when an approved social worker was considering whether it was “reasonably practicable” to consult the nearest relative before making an application to admit a mental patient pursuant to the 1983 Act, the section imposed on the social worker an obligation to strike a balance between the patient’s rights under Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights not to be detained unless that was done by a procedure that was in accordance with the law and the patient’s rights under Art 8 to his private life. A patient’s assertion, even if founded on fact and even if reasonable, that consultation would lead to an infringement of her rights under art 8 of the Convention could not, as a matter of law, lead automatically to the conclusion that it was “not reasonably practicable” to consult the “nearest relative”. Nor was an approved social worker’s conclusion that such consultation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Housing management team expands with specialist partner hire

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Brand protection and IP disputes expertise strengthened with partner hire

NEWS
In a special tribute in this week's NLJ, David Burrows reflects on the retirement of Patrick Allen, co-founder of Hodge Jones & Allen, whose career epitomised the heyday of legal aid
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
back-to-top-scroll