header-logo header-logo

16 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Mental health—Capacity—Sexual relations

D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWHC 101 (COP), [2011] All ER (D) 71 (Feb)

Mental health—Capacity—Sexual relations

D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWHC 101 (COP), [2011] All ER (D) 71 (Feb)
Court of Protection, Mostyn J, 28 Jan 2011

The test for determining whether a person has capacity to engage in sexual relations is whether the person has sufficient rudimentary knowledge of what the act comprises and of its sexual character to enable him or her to decide whether to give or withhold consent.

Joseph O’Brien (instructed by the local authority solicitor) for the authority. Vikram Sachdeva for A.

The proceedings concerned A. He was aged 41 and was seriously challenged in all aspects of his mental function. Prior to the commencement of proceedings, he had shared a home with K, in accommodation provided by the local authority. He had a vigorous sex drive and at some point was reported to have  had a sexual relationship with K. Following reports of him behaving inappropriately towards children, the authority issued proceedings seeking a declaration that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll