header-logo header-logo

Mental health—Persons who lack capacity—Compromise of action

21 March 2014
Issue: 7599 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Dunhill (a protected party by her litigation friend Tasker) v Burgin and another case [2014] UKSC 18

Supreme Court, Lady Hale DP, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson, Lord Wilson and Lord Reed SCJJ, 12 March 2014

The test of capacity to conduct proceedings for the purpose of CPR Pt 21 is the capacity to conduct the claim or cause of action which the claimant in fact has, rather than to conduct the claim as formulated by her lawyers.

James Rowley QC and Matthew Stockwell (instructed by Keoghs LLP) for D. Christopher Melton QC, Marc Willems and Maria Roche (instructed by Potter Rees) for B.

In 1999, D was injured in a road accident. In May 2002, before the limitation period ran out, she issued a claim for damages against the defendant. She claimed to be suffering from among other things a complete loss of the senses of smell and taste, some hearing loss, forgetfulness, headaches and personality change. At trial, she was accompanied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll