header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Mark Hubbard
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Merger talks

A successful merger provides the funds and stability for expansion. But there are risks, says Mark Hubbard

Looking around Lincoln’s Inn it is easy to see that, where there were once many small barristers’ chambers—traditionally a silk or two, half a dozen juniors and a clerk being the norm—there are now fewer, bigger sets. Following Charles Purle QC’s transfiguration into Judge Purle QC on 21 June 2007, mine has 42 barristers, six of them silks, five clerks and as many support staff.

increased mergers

Although the rise in the size of chancery sets is partly the result of a steady stream of arrivals from the other side of Fleet Street, where, after crime stopped paying, bags have become less mixed, the big sets of today are almost all the result of mergers.

Ours took place in 2000, when sets of roughly equal size at 1 New Square and 12 New Square joined forces to form New Square Chambers. Serle Court Chambers and 1 Hare Court merged the same year to form Serle Court. Landmark, Hogarth

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll