header-logo header-logo

31 January 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mesothelioma exemption lost

PI lawyers slam government's u-turn

Personal injury lawyers have slated the government’s U-turn on mesothelioma.

The government has decided to revoke the exemption of mesothelioma claims from the success fees and after-the-event (ATE) premium elements of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

A Ministry of Justice consultation last year asked whether ss 44 and 46 of LASPO should be brought into force for claims for mesothelioma claims—a life-threatening lung disease caused by contact with asbestos. Ministers have now decided to remove the exemption.

Opposition MPs criticised the decision during a Commons debate on mesothelioma this week, and claimant lawyers have also expressed disapproval.  

Matthew Stockwell, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL), says: “It’s impossible to rationalise why dying people should have to pay for the inherent risks of pursuing redress, when they certainly never asked to be in a position where they need compensation.

“Mesothelioma claimants know they are going to die, and they know they have to race against the clock when they make a claim. They are simply trying to make their last few months more bearable, and to ensure that their families will have some security when they’re gone. If ever a claimant needed full compensation, it is surely the claimant facing a death sentence just because he turned up for work."

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll