header-logo header-logo

Mesothelioma exemption lost

31 January 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

PI lawyers slam government's u-turn

Personal injury lawyers have slated the government’s U-turn on mesothelioma.

The government has decided to revoke the exemption of mesothelioma claims from the success fees and after-the-event (ATE) premium elements of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

A Ministry of Justice consultation last year asked whether ss 44 and 46 of LASPO should be brought into force for claims for mesothelioma claims—a life-threatening lung disease caused by contact with asbestos. Ministers have now decided to remove the exemption.

Opposition MPs criticised the decision during a Commons debate on mesothelioma this week, and claimant lawyers have also expressed disapproval.  

Matthew Stockwell, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL), says: “It’s impossible to rationalise why dying people should have to pay for the inherent risks of pursuing redress, when they certainly never asked to be in a position where they need compensation.

“Mesothelioma claimants know they are going to die, and they know they have to race against the clock when they make a claim. They are simply trying to make their last few months more bearable, and to ensure that their families will have some security when they’re gone. If ever a claimant needed full compensation, it is surely the claimant facing a death sentence just because he turned up for work."

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll