header-logo header-logo

12 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Michael King—Charity Commission

michael_king_photo15

Commission appoints Stone King lawyer to manage Syrian aid charity 

The Charity Commission has appointed Michael King from Stone King as interim manager of Al-Fatiha Global (AFG) as part of the Commission’s investigation into the Syrian aid organisation.

The Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into AFG early last year after a number of allegations were made in the media about the charity, established to provide humanitarian aid to refugees in and from Syria.  

Michael, who is a former chairman of Stone King and now works as a consultant in the firm’s charity and social enterprise team, is tasked with improving the management and administration of the charity so that it can be compliant with charity law and good practice and also more effective in delivering its important work.  He will work alongside the charity’s current trustees who will remain in their posts. 

Head of Stone King’s charity and social enterprise team, Jonathan Burchfield says: “This is the 7th time that the Commission has appointed a legal adviser from Stone King to step in and manage a charity that is encountering problems and the appointment is testimony to our expertise in providing practical support to the Charity Commission and to our ability to work with a wide range of charities.” 

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll