header-logo header-logo

21 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Mills & Reeve

New HQ in Cambridge

National law firm Mills & Reeve has moved into a prestigious new headquarters in Cambridge after the completion of a £2.45m office fit out by Overbury.

More than 300 employees have transferred activities to the new offices at Botanic House—a new landmark building on Hills Road.

The seven-storey office development stands between the city’s historic core and the train station. The 60,000 sq ft lens-shaped property, designed by Formation Architects, overlooks Cambridge University’s Botanic Garden.

Ian Mather, partner and head of the Cambridge office for Mills & Reeve, says: “This move demonstrates Mills & Reeve’s commitment to both Cambridge and the wider region.”

Issue: 7553 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll