header-logo header-logo

13 March 2008 / David Jones
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Community care
printer mail-detail

Mind that child

David Jones offers practical guidance on making timely interventions in suspected child abduction cases

On receipt of an allegation of child abduction, a solicitor usually seeks a Prohibited Steps Order (PSO), under s 8 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court to prevent the removal of the child. However, in R v Chief Constable of Cheshire ex parte K [1990] 1 FLR 70, [1990] 1 FCR 201 Lord Justice Neill held that the police are not under an absolute duty to intervene to recover a child (under a s 8 order) unless there is a risk to the health and safety of the child; a breach of the peace, or a situation of violence occurs. The court has its own powers to enforce its orders. Police are required to send a port alert if justified and inform the Border & Immigration Agency (BIA). In practice we find these orders to be of little value to us, unless an allegation of abduction under s 1 of the Child Abduction Act 1984 (CAA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll