header-logo header-logo

29 November 2013 / Kate Beattie
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Mind the gap

web_beattie

When does a failure to prosecute health & safety violations breach human rights? Kate Beattie reports

Criminal prosecutions have not, hitherto, been used as a general regulatory tool for ensuring patient safety and standards of care within the NHS. But this may be set to change. Last month the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust pleaded guilty to breaching health and safety legislation in the case of a diabetic patient, Gillian Astbury, who died after nurses failed to give her insulin. The case, brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), alleged that the trust had failed to devise, implement or manage systems of communication for sharing patient information, including in relation to shift handovers and record-keeping. The trust is now awaiting sentence at the Crown Court where an unlimited fine may be imposed.

The HSE has insisted that its decision to bring the prosecution does not mark a shift in its regulatory role in the health service, and that it has previously prosecuted NHS providers, including trusts, in relation to similar incidents. But the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll