header-logo header-logo

29 November 2013 / Kate Beattie
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Mind the gap

web_beattie

When does a failure to prosecute health & safety violations breach human rights? Kate Beattie reports

Criminal prosecutions have not, hitherto, been used as a general regulatory tool for ensuring patient safety and standards of care within the NHS. But this may be set to change. Last month the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust pleaded guilty to breaching health and safety legislation in the case of a diabetic patient, Gillian Astbury, who died after nurses failed to give her insulin. The case, brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), alleged that the trust had failed to devise, implement or manage systems of communication for sharing patient information, including in relation to shift handovers and record-keeping. The trust is now awaiting sentence at the Crown Court where an unlimited fine may be imposed.

The HSE has insisted that its decision to bring the prosecution does not mark a shift in its regulatory role in the health service, and that it has previously prosecuted NHS providers, including trusts, in relation to similar incidents. But the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll