header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Mind the gaps!

Gareth Kagan and Beverley Barton offer some guidance on witness statements from recent cases

Recent Court of Appeal decisions on applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence on appeal provide some useful pointers of good practice regarding witness statements.

Three legs of a stool
Paragraph 52.11(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) provides that an appeal court subject to the CPR will not receive: (i) fresh oral evidence; (ii) evidence which was not before the lower court, unless the court orders otherwise.

Although the pre-CPR requirement for “special grounds” no longer applies, there has not been a sea change in the attitude of the courts, so we need to take a trip back to 1954, and a case featuring the following facts:

a tin of money stashed under a bed—with the credit crunch, perhaps this will become a feature in modern cases;

alleged payment of £1,000 in a brown paper parcel, but no receipt;

a wife compelled to give evidence regarding her husband, at trial, the day after filing for divorce on the grounds of adultery; and

a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll