header-logo header-logo

Mind the gaps!

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Gareth Kagan and Beverley Barton offer some guidance on witness statements from recent cases

Recent Court of Appeal decisions on applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence on appeal provide some useful pointers of good practice regarding witness statements.

Three legs of a stool
Paragraph 52.11(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) provides that an appeal court subject to the CPR will not receive: (i) fresh oral evidence; (ii) evidence which was not before the lower court, unless the court orders otherwise.

Although the pre-CPR requirement for “special grounds” no longer applies, there has not been a sea change in the attitude of the courts, so we need to take a trip back to 1954, and a case featuring the following facts:

a tin of money stashed under a bed—with the credit crunch, perhaps this will become a feature in modern cases;

alleged payment of £1,000 in a brown paper parcel, but no receipt;

a wife compelled to give evidence regarding her husband, at trial, the day after filing for divorce on the grounds of adultery; and

a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll