header-logo header-logo

Mind the gaps!

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Gareth Kagan and Beverley Barton offer some guidance on witness statements from recent cases

Recent Court of Appeal decisions on applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence on appeal provide some useful pointers of good practice regarding witness statements.

Three legs of a stool
Paragraph 52.11(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) provides that an appeal court subject to the CPR will not receive: (i) fresh oral evidence; (ii) evidence which was not before the lower court, unless the court orders otherwise.

Although the pre-CPR requirement for “special grounds” no longer applies, there has not been a sea change in the attitude of the courts, so we need to take a trip back to 1954, and a case featuring the following facts:

a tin of money stashed under a bed—with the credit crunch, perhaps this will become a feature in modern cases;

alleged payment of £1,000 in a brown paper parcel, but no receipt;

a wife compelled to give evidence regarding her husband, at trial, the day after filing for divorce on the grounds of adultery; and

a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll