header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Mind the gaps!

Gareth Kagan and Beverley Barton offer some guidance on witness statements from recent cases

Recent Court of Appeal decisions on applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence on appeal provide some useful pointers of good practice regarding witness statements.

Three legs of a stool
Paragraph 52.11(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) provides that an appeal court subject to the CPR will not receive: (i) fresh oral evidence; (ii) evidence which was not before the lower court, unless the court orders otherwise.

Although the pre-CPR requirement for “special grounds” no longer applies, there has not been a sea change in the attitude of the courts, so we need to take a trip back to 1954, and a case featuring the following facts:

a tin of money stashed under a bed—with the credit crunch, perhaps this will become a feature in modern cases;

alleged payment of £1,000 in a brown paper parcel, but no receipt;

a wife compelled to give evidence regarding her husband, at trial, the day after filing for divorce on the grounds of adultery; and

a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll