header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017 / David White , Tom Morrison
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Mind the GDPR

nlj_7762_morrison

In the first of a series of articles, Rollits LLP provides an essential overview of the General Data Protection Regulation

  • The changes introduced by the GDPR create a number of challenges for organisations that process personal data.
  • Organisations that have DPA compliant measures in place will be in a good position to handle those challenges.

On 25 May 2018, the UK’s current data protection legislation—the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1988)—will be replaced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR imposes significant additional obligations on the way organisations are able to lawfully obtain, hold and handle personal data. In this, the first of a four-part series on the GDPR, we consider why the current data protection legislation needed updating and provide an overview of some of the key changes being introduced.

The need for reform

It has long been recognised that an individual’s personal data is a valuable commodity which should be protected by any organisation that has access to or uses it. The first fundamental piece of legislation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll