header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / Tim Spencer-Lane
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Mind over matter

spencer_lane

Tim Spencer-Lane reports on a ground-breaking Mental Health Bill

In England and Wales, as in most jurisdictions, the non-consensual care and treatment of those with mental health problems is governed largely by two parallel legal schemes. The Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides for the care and treatment of those suffering from “mental disorder”, irrespective of whether they have capacity or not, while the Mental Capacity Act 2005 applies only to those who lack capacity and enables care and treatment for mental and physical health conditions.

NI proposals

However, in Northern Ireland radical new proposals have been published to fuse together mental health and mental capacity law into a single legislative framework. The draft Mental Capacity Bill, if implemented, would mean that for the first time anywhere, there would be a single statute governing all decision-making in relation to the care, treatment (for a physical or mental illness) or personal welfare of a person aged 16 or over, who lacks capacity to make a specific decision. This would mean that the current Mental

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll