header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / Tim Spencer-Lane
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Mind over matter

spencer_lane

Tim Spencer-Lane reports on a ground-breaking Mental Health Bill

In England and Wales, as in most jurisdictions, the non-consensual care and treatment of those with mental health problems is governed largely by two parallel legal schemes. The Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides for the care and treatment of those suffering from “mental disorder”, irrespective of whether they have capacity or not, while the Mental Capacity Act 2005 applies only to those who lack capacity and enables care and treatment for mental and physical health conditions.

NI proposals

However, in Northern Ireland radical new proposals have been published to fuse together mental health and mental capacity law into a single legislative framework. The draft Mental Capacity Bill, if implemented, would mean that for the first time anywhere, there would be a single statute governing all decision-making in relation to the care, treatment (for a physical or mental illness) or personal welfare of a person aged 16 or over, who lacks capacity to make a specific decision. This would mean that the current Mental

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll